Is it really 'bullying' to question the proponent of a hypothesis about accuracy, validity of data, logic, mathematical process and relevance of information to that hypothesis?
In scientific circles I believe it is called peer review
If we can now have a reasoned debate about rotor stall then I am all for it but leave the UCA out there with the scientologists.
AnFi - one more attempt to ellicit facts about your apache speed assessment - if you didn't use accurate reference points, what did you use to ensure accurate timing since that is crucial?