The relevant arithmetic is
c=a/b
so if a doubles then c doubles
if b halves then c also doubles
if a and b both double then c STAYS THE SAME
That isn't arithmetic, it is algebra and it doesn't have any numbers (other than the ones you have selected) in to to show how you arrive at your answers.
You still haven't put any actual data on here or into your equations - therefore they are just algebraic manipulation and not mathematical proof.
why don't you see what the point is and take it from there? most people think its about Ca getting bigger when the RRPM goes down, but surprisingly it gets bigger because the Cl has gone up! Clmax being the useful limit and the point where UCA will be acheived regardless of RRPM.
this is still JUST your opinion, not backed up with any evidence whatsoever. Whenever you are asked for evidence you just say we don't 'get it' and repeat the same mantra over and over - that doesn't make it true.
The whole point of presenting a theory for public scrutiny is that you provide data to support your position - this has been lacking from the start and shows no sign of being rectified.