A very good post flynow......
i am quite disturbed that the report has made no reference to the role of the CAA ops inspector and made comment as to his oversight over so many aspects of this......
The training and testing by one guy , if true, is one hell of a revelation....and surely should have been commented on.
Reference the engineering company that maintained the aircraft.....I am told that the company belonged to the main man at LEA!!!!! If that is true then it is highly relevant and quite unbelievable.....
Someone know if this is true?