PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Sully-Hudson-and FEW safety changes
View Single Post
Old 11th Oct 2016, 23:53
  #31 (permalink)  
Pozidrive
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Midlands
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by .Scott
From a system engineering prospective, this would not be difficult to do.
For example, each engine controller could determine the health of its own engine and specifically if it was reliable enough to allow another engine to shut down. If it was, it would send a continuous coded "reliable engine" message to the other engine controller. A controller would only shut down the engine after it had terminated its own "reliable engine" message for some period of time (a few seconds), was receiving the "reliable engine" message from the other controller, and had determined that running its own engine was unsafe.
And if you wanted to use the last bit of power from an unhealthy engine that the computer shut down, before it failed?
Pozidrive is offline