I can't quite understand this.
Isn't this development a positive move and is being introduced on that fact that their is no evidence for medical for type of flying this declaration is for.
I would of thought that organisations such as AOPA would welcome such a move which many of their members and the wider GA community as a whole see as a positive move. As it reduces the cost if flying and yet has no impact on safety.
Now maybe there is some areas where aspects are not optimal but can't organisations such as AOPA/LAA/BMAA work with the CAA et al to smooth these areas out?