Originally Posted by
slast
The "monitored approach" aspects of this thread have little to do with the original topic. If people want to continue it I'd be happy to copy the relevant comments to a new one in the "Tech Log" forum which would be more appropriate than "Rumours and News" and leave this one for the actual subject of the NTSB report in question. But only if there are a few indications of agreement that it would meet with approval.
Steve
I'd agree. Whether or not in favour of the 'Monitored Approach', the discussion of MA raises CRM aspects of advocacy and assertion on the flight deck which, no matter the particular SOP followed, are an important part of flight safety.
I still replay events where I should have, could have but didn't.
A separate thread in Tech would, I think, be a good move.
p.s. I know all multi-crew approaches are monitored. In this case "monitored approach" is just shorthand for a particular SOP.