Originally Posted by chopjock
However if the blades are turning with no pilot at the controls, clearly the purpose is not to fly!
Originally Posted by
chopjock
Except there is no "subsequent" in front of the word "flight."
Great. For which reason is it then turning under power, if not for flight?
Try coming up with something reasonable that would convince the EASA bureaucrats.
Easy prey for any lawyer if the **** hits the fan, or in this case vice versa.
What TC said.