KenV writes:
2. Can the remote sensor platform transmit the above target data at sufficient bandwidth to ensure near real time target tracking? Link 16 lacks the bandwidth.
3. Can the Aegis/SM6 installation receive and process the data in near real enough time to enable a missile launch and then guide that missile to enable the missile to intercept the target?
I suspect that a fourth consideration would be can the remote sensor platform transmit the targeting data securely and with low probability of signal intercept?
E-2D backhaul to the CVG uses Link-16, and it processes a lot of data for multiple targets. Providing initial and midcourse targeting cues against a single target for the SM-6 isn't particularly data intensive, and in fact, Super Hornets and Growlers can and have done the same. This test was to prove MADL compatibility with the latest Aegis baseline, and demonstrate that F-35Bs can provide some over-the-horizon targeting ability for a formation that lacks the ability to support organic AEW assets. However, the F-35B lacks the persistence to perform a meaningful AEW mission, so the hype of this evolution smells of another Marine publicity stunt. The LPI aspect of MADL is an advantage when transmitting from within the enemy's WEZ, although I'm pretty sure that the F-35B's limited range would place the ARG in harms way. And providing updated guidance to the SM-6 is not stealthy, nor is using the F-35Bs radar to track the target.