SP
Thanks
But if you don't remove the pro twin nonsense and you do remove the anti twin 'nonsense' then it looks like you are biased.
I would be pleasantly impressed if you actually had the same number of hours twin and single as I have. It is just possible but extremely unlikely.
Yes: rechecking your hours I was referencing an older article, and you will obviously have a few thousand up in the intervening years!
Splot
Anyhow it is unsurprising that (as you say) the majority of posters are against my posts since this forum is dominated by pro-twin (superstitious) types.
The logic and maths used to justify the twin has been discredited, will you justify it? (1x10^-5)^2 ? It is not evidentially nor theoretically supported.
It is evident that the twin does not have the safety yeild it is supposed to have.
If this accident, at night in the mountains, has ANYTHING to do with engine failure then i'll eat your hat ! (pretty safe bet)
If it is'nt engine failure what humble pie will you eat?