PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - c/l 1/2RhoV2S
Thread: c/l 1/2RhoV2S
View Single Post
Old 6th Sep 2001, 03:31
  #5 (permalink)  
humpty
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

When flying S&L, thrust and drag cancel each other out, as do weight and lift, hence no acceleration.

Now, if I point the nose up, a part of the thrust vector points upwards, and (once all the other forces have settled down and we're in a steady climb) there's again no acceleration because I'm in a constant climb. Therefore since the plane hasn't got any heavier, there must be less lift generated from the wings than in S&L since the total upward force is lift + upward portion of thrust.

Now, I point the nose down and, (if I'm not idling the engine totally) after everything settles down, I'm again in a zero acceleration situation. Since part of the thrust vector is down (assuming I am actually pointing the nose below the horizon) then there must therefore be more lift generated from the wings than in S&L.

I understand it, I can explain it (well, you tell me...) but it still seems wrong!
humpty is offline