Beagle Whilst we can't all be totally correct all of the time, I wouldn't just dismiss what I said as "nonsense" quite so quickly.
You are correct in that it did not instigate the whole Procedure - I believed it did, but the accident resulted in a change to the CANP to include all flying up to 1000' AGL, please refer to
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP625.pdf from pdf Page 30, document page 44, and a greater publicity campaign in the Civil world. This campagin is made my assumption that it did introduce the Procedure.
Indeed it also led to the tightening up on procedures for camera aircraft.
"The light aircraft world learned many things from this accident - the professionalism of RAF low flying was never in doubt" Agreed, but what I posted was not "nonsense".