To prevent crashes, what we - who pay you peasants your wages - really need is far harsher, and probably collective punishments for failing crew.
A failing magenta line follower isn't just a magenta line follower which knows it's too tired, or too emo but clocks in for work anyway.
A failing magenta line follower is a magenta line follower or other airline thing that knows - or is in a position to know - that the other magenta line follower is too tired or ill or emo or psycho, but doesn't call it out.
So when something like Germanwings 9525 happens, we, as the folk who pay your wages, need to know that not just the perp's family will be destitute and out on the street, but that will also happen to all the folk who knew the perp, but didn't say anything.
---
Do you get this objectification thing yet ?
You could try looking up "in-groups" and "out-groups".
A couple non-aviation articles you might want to look at below. They might seem a bit tangential, but I'm not so sure.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...-report-cycle/
https://hbr.org/2015/02/why-debunkin...ubious-parents
Thing is, lots of passengers don't want loads of carry-on. But you peasants steal, break, disappear, delay, or just ship to some other random destination checked stuff, so we have to carry on stuff we'd rather put in the hold. If it's important, and can't be carried on, we have to use Fedex or a private flight.