The above is the relevant bit note how the CAA are trying to imply that the EASA REGS are far more demanding than the equivalent FAA and as such MAY be far safer?? what a load of unsubstantiated bull / more regulations equals better safety? Maybe for the longevity of the EASA regulators jobs
Thats what they think. In a meeting in Cologne I asked them to cleanly forbid flying, as that would be much safer - guaranteed. A defining silence followed.
NCC is a AOC on the JAR-OPS level from a efforts point of view. As it was the case with JAR-OPS, nothing is safer afterwards, and the money that is required to cut all those trees will be saved, where it was saved in the JAR/EASA/EU-operations: crews - cause thats the ONLY place the operators can go ahead and cut costs. So we will see some 1500hrs jockeys in LHS on Globals etc , flying basically for food.
Brave new world.