I feel the Mahon side have really lacked integrity
argument(s) to counter all these irrefutable facts (of ours)
to question the integrity of others whose language is moderate and whose
motives are altogether sincere , as you might say , stinks.
to imply that in your camp you are the high and mighty all-knowing store holders of 'irrefutable facts'
which you maintain outright demolish many Mahon/Vette hypotheses,
is frankly farcical laughable and a very good reason to throw up hands in despair of these exchanges ever going anywhere truly of value to researchers into such matters.
(want a for instance? . .why keep quoting Chippindale as a reliable source as to anything , including the CVR transcripts, when it was he who so deviously doctored them.?)