Thank you, and noted.
We are asking, in effect, for transitional protection. It's fair. I accept that there will always be fresh victims but we had TP for AFPS15 - why is that acceptable, but this not? Further, the Central Advisory Committee for Compensation appear to have discussed changes before the legislation was very quietly changed in 2010 (coincidentally, just before the redundancies were announced) but deemed them 'non contentious'. It's all very weird.