The important thing is we rejected the flawed TA. What they choose to do now will be more expensive and create more issues than having properly negotiated a descent TA in the first place. We don't need to do anything now. It's all up to them and what they can get from the regulators with respect to bending rules. It's up to the AOA to detail its objection to the CAD that the dispensations are only a result of the company un willing to address issues in their entirety and that their half measures only resulted in approximately half the votes for the TA. If they had have been more encompassing of the issues in the first place. The TA would have been ratified and the need for dispensations and the like would be unnecessary.