PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Erebus 25 years on
View Single Post
Old 9th Jul 2016, 00:59
  #1097 (permalink)  
Chronic Snoozer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Coal Face
Posts: 1,305
Received 339 Likes on 130 Posts
Originally Posted by megan
Memorandum of the Royal Commissioner, Mr. Justice Mahon, as to Evidence and Information Obtained Overseas

Exact quote, "There were occasions, so it was said by one witness, when Air New Zealand aircraft were observed to be flying in and out of cloud although on the basis of their radio transmissions they were flying VMC.
This was from a ground observer at McMurdo, hardly proof of non-VMC compliance. It's possible for cloud to be between the observer and aircraft giving the impression the aircaft entered cloud.

Thanks for that photo Compresser Stall. Clears things up a lot. It's easy to see how a relatively high overcast could obscure Ross/Erebus completely.

Is it fair to say then you would not descend (today) without a radar or navaid fix?

If you would, can you describe the limits of visual identification that you would consider acceptable in terms of visibility, sight of ground or water or ice and landmarks for descending below MSA under IFR?

Last edited by Chronic Snoozer; 9th Jul 2016 at 01:07. Reason: Clarification
Chronic Snoozer is offline