Correct, but you don't seem to extend that same latitude towards people who disagree with you.
They are not disagreeing with me, they are disagreeing with the evidence as presented by Chippindale or Mahon, which is all I quote.
With respect to the "false horizon" theory - it's just one (unqualified) man's idea.
I'll accept that, but what have you got to rebut what the experts I mention in the previous post had to say?
At 1500' they found themselves flying in a ping pong ball. There was no clear surface/horizon definition
You are quite right, there was no clear surface/horizon definition AHEAD. Twelve seconds prior to impact (.86 miles by my calc) the co-pilot said it was clear to the right. Why would he be saying "clear"?