Where are we going?
If the TA is rejected by anything less than a resounding NO there will be insufficient mandate for major RP revision. If the vote is only 50-1, what minor concessions will the company agree to in their effort to move a few guys to the YES camp?
O-days? 13 year history. Fundamental to how they build today's roster. Do we fight to restrict their use or to remove them (and loose W patters)?
Delta style pay increase? CX is profitable yet Delta's 20% profit margin is huge. No comparison. Great slogan but not reasonable.
3-man Europe? How much does the company want it? 3-man to the rest of the world? Come on?! That requires not just a change to our RP but revision to CAD regulation. Possible in a decade or two.
Seniority only roster system? I want "more" control. Yet who wants to upgrade expecting a painful roster of split duty and night flying? The most senior can sit back, relax and not work because they earned it??? Someone has to do the work. Better that we ALL pull our load equally.
We need to understand exactly what WE as a group want to achieve if or when the TA is voted NO or we will wake up the next day with the British look go what-did-we-just-do?