Cheers.
but you have to fight fire with fire.
No, I disagree. Perverting the course of justice is always morally bankrupt.
As is, of course, an airline shredding documents pertaining to the Antarctic operation. To this day I find it astonishing that this wasn't breaking any law!
But it leaves me wondering to which side the orchestrated litany of lies was directed at, airline, union, both? Any idea?
It was unequivocally directed at the airline witnesses including the senior pilots. It was a foolish comment to make, and it was this that the Court of Appeal and the Privy Council had the most issue with. There simply weren't sufficient grounds to allege that a co-ordinated cover-up had taken place.