Canute, Glad Rag suffers the ailment of "playing the man, not the ball" - a posting history of snark and tenuous-at-best internet pictures/GIFs with scant contribution to the debate at hand instantly proves that accusation.
I enjoy engaging with those who challenge the viewpoints I make, using their professional knowledge, reasoning and irrefutable logic, rather than label and lambast the style in which I make those viewpoints. One of those approaches is widely considered the essence of meaningful debate. The other is not - call it antagonising, inflaming, trolling or whatever. It's just a shame GR fails to grasp that fundamental difference but he's in a very small percentage of folk here who argue consistently from a known repertoire of logical fallacies. I'm by no means whiter than white but I try to inform where I can and express my opinion where I think it adds to a side of the argument, as long as it actually adds that is.
Last edited by MSOCS; 15th Jun 2016 at 15:25.