prospector, do you really think that findings of the Privy Council and NZ Appeal Court are more relevant, in this case, than those by ICAO
Certainly, there is no doubt of that.and the following is one of the reasons why.
Because the findings of the Royal Commission of Inquiry on the cause of the disaster were limited in scope, being legally an opinion and not a statement of fact, they could not be appealed in legal terms, unlike the Office of Air Accidents Investigation report, which remains the sole official account- and has never been officially challenged.