Originally Posted by
HeliComparator
Because for example the hours on the epicyclic since overhaul must be known but it's not been reported. Ditto the HUMS history. Maybe the relevant HUMS history is zero (probably not!) in which case say so. What maintenance activities relating to the struts? Must be known, but secret. Exactly what bits of struts were found where (ie what remained attached to the transmission decking, what was attached to the free flying bit. This must be known but the release of info on this subject has been cryptic.
WHY?
I fully agree with HeliComparator!
Seeing in the light of how the bereaved from former accidents
are feeling towards the openness of the investigation, it is high time
that there is put some pressure on it!
Not to leak, but to be frank, humble and correct in the statements made.
Up until now I have found several contradictions in the info stated by CHC
Also the need to have a public advisor present, and thus is hesitating to
the most extent to confirm or make clear any of the questions asked by the press.
This is not alone only the case with CHC, but also Statoil and
as well AH.