@Nadar: From my point of view the game is already over. This is just not officially and publicly acknowledged, because the final report of AIBN still is pending.
‘Breakdown of suspension bar or of epicyclic gear box, what occurred first’, is rather an insignificant ‘hen or egg question’ due to a supserannuated design of (SUPER) PUMA. The results and similitudes are constant since years and since a series of crashs.
How do you reach a consensus without endless circular discussions (see http://www.pprune.org/9372108-post612.html)?
- Retrospective: The pitcher goes often to the well and gets broken at last.
- Prospective: Let us wish in a new technical savety-, performance- and market-scenario to H175 and to AH a prosper and sucessfull future and the very same to their competitors.
Last edited by AW009; 1st Jun 2016 at 04:03.
Reason: Link to circular diskussions