In order for me to better understand why this program is in such a parlous state I felt the need to refresh on the reasons by reading through the archived threads associated with this project. However, on my travels I came across
this (for me), little gem of potted history up to 2015.
Ignoring the fact that it is written by an academic, the timeline of subterfuge is both long and amoebic.
Does the panel recognise that from reading this document, that the chances of a successful project outcome must be slim or none?
Apologies if the link was posted in a previous thread.
Imagegear