PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - What is the reason for separate military ATC?
Old 24th May 2016, 07:34
  #42 (permalink)  
itsnotthatbloodyhard
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Elsewhere
Posts: 610
Received 70 Likes on 29 Posts
Jeez, it's like a scratched record.

Dick, you started out on separate civil/military ATC systems, moved on (via a truly bizarre diversion into nuclear submarines) to the Seasprite debacle, and now we're back orbiting over Anna Bay, in a post that might as well be a cut-and-paste of about a dozen others that have appeared here in recent months.

On each issue, you've either been shot down or had your questions answered, and it makes no difference - you just ignore it and move smoothly on to your next hoary old chestnut.

What troubles me is that some of your comments (I'm thinking here of the 'agenda to damage Australia' one and the 'military fools and piston-powered submarine' stuff) are not opinionated or passionate, they're just downright....odd. Odd to the point of being genuinely worrying.

One's credibility is a hard-won and precious thing. It's a shame you seem intent on burning yours up with bizarre and silly statements. Maybe time to pause, take a deep breath, and figure out exactly what you think you're achieving here?
itsnotthatbloodyhard is offline