PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - What is the reason for separate military ATC?
Old 23rd May 2016, 22:26
  #35 (permalink)  
Dick Smith
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,602
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 28 Posts
Nothing against the RAAF. As I have stated many times on this site it was ex RAAF Ron Cooper who started the major regulatory cost reductions at CAA .

However the Onesky system is obviously going to be another Super Seasprite type disaster.

That's where $1.4 billion of taxpayers money was lost and military personnel were totally let down. This time half of the loss will be paid by our industry.

Just because it was a good idea in 1946 to have a separate military ATC it may not be now.

Remember these military fools are saying nothing about Australia spending tens of billions on piston powered submarines when everyone with any commonsense knows that they must be nuclear or not at all. Clearly sending our submariners to their deaths with the present decision. The French don't even make piston powered craft so will have to convert the nuclear models. A bit like ordering a new Airbus to be made in SA but with engines from the Super Constellation

Utter incompetence. Wait until I am Diktator.
Dick Smith is offline