I find it odd that after the Gnat accident there was no outcry form the CAA or the Press. No great imposition of display restrictions, or massive increase in CAA fees. Presumably because only the pilot was killed, no civilians involved.
It seems both accidents may have had the same issues of recency etc. yet the reaction to the Hunter event was huge, to the detriment of the display industry. Presumably,because purely through chance, the aircraft unfortunately landed on a busy road rather than an empty field.
The excessive, in my opinion, knee jerk, must be seen to do something, reaction of the CAA continues.
The hugely popular Jersey Air Show apparently in the balance this year. The organisers being told that although the displays take place over the sea, that they must ensure no vessels of any sort must be moored in St Aubins bay. Any incursion of this rule means immediate cessation of flying. No spectators to be allowed at all on the whole of the bay beach, with severe vehicle restrictions in the vicinity, Elizabeth Castle must be clear of all persons. All these positions normally places of observation for this great show.
And of course the massive increase in fees
This event normally brings in a large amount of funds to Charitable organisations.
Presumably. with this criteria, if the Farnborough Air Show is to go ahead the whole urban area under the flight path of any display item must be clear of potential spectators or persons.
Health and safety gone mad!!
Last edited by cessnapete; 15th May 2016 at 07:24.