Originally Posted by
TylerMonkey
I think you answered your own question.
Why would the manufacturer recommend a return to service this quickly if they HAD NOT ruled out design or manuf issues. Seems like a logical conclusion, would be very negligent to proceed if they think there is any chance a defect of theirs will come back to bite them. I wonder how many lawyers are advising them . . .
Why would a manufacturer ground their type without proof of a design/ manufacturing failure?
Airbus is standing behind their product until it's proven, possibly, to be defective.....imho