Originally Posted by
spectral
ALTERNATIVES?
Fill in the blanks.
S-92 - ...a sheat and too expensive (impossible to take full fuel full pax) this is for this reason the 225 come back on fisrt place after the drop of oil barrel....
Doubts over MGB run-dry. Escape window sizes poor by modern standards. Noisiest thing in the sky (Captains' ears!). (Same fuel vs pax issue in SAR!)
Originally Posted by
spectral
AW189 - ...the two of bristow was park and he don't use it (a sheat)
Works for everyone except Bristow! Hmmm?
Originally Posted by
spectral
EC175 - ...certainly a alternative but limit to 14pax with "confort" but wait for svow certification
Some say too small but compared to what? ... 139? S-76?
Originally Posted by
spectral
S-61 - ...a T-REX with a rotor
Much loved around the O&G industry by all those who understand nothing about its performance!
Originally Posted by
spectral
Mi-171 - ...WAHOOOUUUU
AW101 - ...A bad copy of NH-90 but why not why not 'depend of the price (a 225 is 23Meuros)
NH90 - ...Never certificate for civilian, you can buy 10 H175 with the price of 1 NH90
I read something about L2 (i don't know where) but Bond use 4 L2 for pax and 2 L2 for SAR... and i'm not surprised if the L2 return to flight during this week....
For the questions about the H215e the main gear box is the same of 332L1 or 332L2...
About the MGB of NH90 we don't talk about the same thing for the design and the size...
And for the return of 225 if this tragedy result of maintenance problem you see certainly again this aircraft in the sky of north sea because is certainly the more economic with the best performance...you can take off with full pax full fuel and with the additional tank (it was alone a this price).....Remember actually with the low price of barrel all the company search the services with Lowest cost....