Mr Paggi
A) you are an AW employee !
B) you are a salesman ! (selling HOGEFAP (Hover Out of Ground Effect Fly-Away Performance)
C) your technical arguments are susspect (selling HOGEFAP) because they are likely to support the interests of your employer
D) there is nothing wrong with my technical understanding, thank you.
Itally has a very fine heritage of design (Savoia, Macchi, Piagio, Ferarri etc etc, way groovier that the Germans or French ever managed etc how can you tollerate allowing that heritage to be sold out to bureaucrats, wtf do they know about design? You know better, or at least you should!)
Why don't you honestly answer the question about 'exposure' ?
It CAN be safer, true?
What's your answer in the example? If you want then replace 6,1,3,2 with w,y.x and z and then say where you think the safety threshold is? but the point is it IS somewhere, right?
Perhaps even a B3 with 2 pax, 2 dingies and floats and 2 sliding doors would be safer?
More pilot employed also.
We can't have aviation design poilcy made from commercial interest nor amateur guesswork, unless you want protectionism?
Don't disparage my technical credentials if you don't know what they are pls.
you have been
AnFi'd