Nowhere in the article or in JQ/QF policy does it state or imply that a male will be overlooked despite being more suitable for the job. NOWHERE!!!!
Hmmmm, not exactly how it reads in the article by my interpretation.
For the past year, it has had a policy in place to aim for an even split between male and female candidates for interviews and shortlisted for jobs
I thought we're all supposed to be equal these days? If that were the case we wouldn't have to be talking about these stupid things. But it appears I have my chances severely reduced if I was against a female candidate even if my standard was higher.