"I hope that the European Institutions are sensible to safety and reject the EASA’s request for penetrating the HV envelope.
Sometimes safety should prevail on business"
Sounds to me like you are the one interested in the business case rather than safety.
Safety abuse, playing on regulator's paranoia, for business purposes is insincere and cynical.
Where's the safety evidence for PC1? You are an AW salesman I guess? Or someone trying to pitch for a bigger budget?