"Problem as I see it is that a few people come up with absurd statements which have no legal grounding. These people need to be called out. "
I agree.
"A simple Google will show differences between admissibility in civil or criminal proceedings."
Correct.
"Member of Middle Temple since 1998."
Really? Can you tell us in your own words how 'evidence' gained unlawfully and showing no criminal activity whatsoever could possibly be held admissible.
It is my submission that we can all agree that an unfortunate accident took place and would not need any Go Pro evidence to support that.
'If' this case proceeds, it is again my submission that there is no case to answer.
Others may disagree and that is their prerogative.