Jaba
and prove beyond correlation that you are correct.
I say there is a correlation. I cannot prove beyond correlation that there is a correlation. So every time you deny it I will simply rebut you with the graphic data.
Your opininon:
...for the most part correlated with EGT? Why…? Because IT DOES NOT
1943 data:
Your opinion:
for that matter when better equipped tests many years later have proved and refined the results, you have refused to accept them.
You have not provided any data from later and better tests.