Ok, but upon what "facts" have the RAPACs based their opposition? Why is their opinion any more valid than CASA's?
You have argued that CASA does not have the power to make a direction about the use of Area VHF at unmarked aerodromes. That argument is based, in part, upon opposition from the RAPACs. If CASA has an obligation to prove that there is a safety case to justify its actions, then surely the RAPACs have an obligation to justify their opposition, or is it a one way street?
Could we please leave the military out of this discussion? With respect, that kind of opprobrium does nothing to bolster your argument.
Last edited by BuzzBox; 7th Apr 2016 at 02:31.