tucumseh
After reading read your explanation, I looked again at what I had previously seen alleged in identical style by 'someone' on another aviation related website. (As mentioned in my original response to you.)
There was far more to the correspondence than merely sending the Chief Executive a copy of written evidence given to the Nimrod and Philip Reviews. If that had been all that happened then the CE's response would have been outrageous. It wasn't.
I now think misinterpretation of what the CE wrote (the possibility I suggested previously) is very mild – and certainly not the word I would use now.
This issue is way off topic so I'll leave it at that.