destinationsky
Am more than familiar with the regulatory process, it's part of what I now do to keep the old grey matter active, and how ridiculous some of the hoops that you have to jump through invariably are. Furthermore I am totally aware of the obstacle environments for RWY 02 & 20, so never expected any improvements in minima, just having the aircraft aligned on the runway centreline at the MAPt is a major consideration to a successful approach.
From what you indicate can we now expect RNAV/GNSS procedures in the next few months? If so can we now expect attention to be focussed on the outstanding tree problem south of the runway to improve take-off performance on RWY 20 and make the RWY 02 approach lighting obstacle free areas CAP 168 compliant in order that I can see it on base leg?