Step Turn
First, you jump to the conclusion that a Maule pilot was reckless and guilty of an offence which he clearly was not. Now you come here stating that this pilot made control movements to put the aircraft in to the ground.
Please don't come here in Mother Teresa style stating the obvious in that that pilots must understand how control surfaces work in relation to their control inputs. Whilst it is refreshing to learn that you will accept the AAIB findings, perhaps you would also like to give us your interpretation of the word "accident".
PrivtPilotRadarTech
The phrase "appeared to be responding to the pilot's control inputs" speaks volumes.
Does it? Who for?