Thanks for the thought Circuit Basher, like most I have been using the website and monitoring it over a period of time. My post was intended for PPRuNe and I will give a fuller reponse on the flyontrack website when I have read the report thoroughly again.
The reason I wanted to post here was because after discussion with Phil Bate of AIS last month, his organisation are keen to monitor feedback from all different forum tools so I tend to use PPRuNe and other sites for this purpose to prompt conversation amongst people who use this site especially where it concerns PIB and NOTAM. I use any opportunity to keep the PIB/NOTAM issues high on the GA forum agenda! This should in no way detract from the primary feedback tool as you correctly mention.
Regards
Andy
P.S. I didn't take your post to be pompous in any way, you were not aware of what was in my mind when posting and your point is very valid.
Last edited by Andrew Sinclair; 18th July 2003 at 22:16.