TV
Originally Posted by
Lonewolf_50
MQ-9 need not be expendable, as the family of weapons it can carry will include weapons that have range. Ten of those versus one and a half F-35's. Hmmm, interesting decision point.
@LO: it has long since stopped being entertaining, this personal bone you have to pick with at least on participant. Maybe you could trade PM's with the personal disagreements, not clutter up the discussion* that a variety of others participate in.
* Such as it is; as the dead horse being beaten is nearly glue at this point
Really
It is often the case on this particular Mil forum that certain participants have either willfully deceived and/or claim that they are being persecuted when "challenged"
As for this thread, why the hell shouldn't people question the acquisition management of the airframe and the actual capability it may (or may never) bring?