Just doesn't answer the question as to how we are 'unique,' Dick. See previous posts in respect of the obfuscation going back years.
Like all your other arguments, you revert to the emotive when pinned.
MDX was dumbass stuff, IMHO. The PIC had choices and did not take the logical.
When in radar coverage in uncontrolled airspace under the J curve you could not talk to a radar controller .
It helped destroy MDX.
I thought it was all the RAAF's fault in respect of your previous arguments. Please, can we have some consistency rather than sprays?
And please answer my question as to how we are 'unique' in comparison to Canada and NZ in respect of offshore airspace?
You and the acolytes hammered this one for years in respect of NAS. 'Uniqueness' underpinned your arguments in pushing a flawed system and offshore airspace was consistently offered up as proof that we are 'unique.'
Well, Cobber, we ain't 'unique,' Once again, see previous posts. When you make an argument about 'uniqueness,' make sure you cross the t's and dot the i's!