---- with clueless VFR in non-surveillance E "best"?Safe?
Tell that to pax on that 737 that were nearly killed by the clueless Tobago driver.
Le Ping,
Why the continual denigration/assumption that VFR are clueless??, a common assumption/attitude among self-confessed and self-described "professionals", whatever professional actually means in this context, as being a commercial pilot has never formally been recognised as a profession.
For example, of the long list of professions whose members can witness under the Statutory Declaration Act 1959, commercial/airline pilot is not one, but a cabin crew member who was a nurse can so do.
Does an owner/pilot like CASA CEO/DAS AVM (Rtd.) Skidmore, AM, automatically become "clueless" when he flies VFR, or is there some other particular defining characteristic to determine automatic VFR cluelessness.
Tootle pip!!
PS:
Angus ------- also had nothing to do with 'Rollback.'
That may well be technically correct, as the real reason for the rollback was a matter of actions taken by the then CASA DAS/CEO as a result of the
famous/infamous bottom-drawer letter, despite the success of the 12 months trial, and one the eve of that part of NAS being declared permanent. The rollback DID NOT happen because of the Launceston vastly over hyped (industrially) incident, despite the fond and undoubtedly sincerely held belief of many of you.