Originally Posted by
Jan Olieslagers
The link does work for me - and I am quite shocked too, but mainly at the lack of professionalism shown.
Why must responses be to one person's private identity? Isn't that a breach of privacy? Surely the least bit of professionalism would point one to some functional mailbox, like comments at organisation dot uk dot gov ?
Why is no reason or motivation given for the proposed change? How can one comment meaningfully without knowing the reasons for a change?
What club of amateurs published this kind of rubbish?
The response is addressed to the person dealing with the response, and it is to their work address. One would assume they have agreed to this. It could be seen as more appropriate than sending your response to an anonymous mail box.
The reason and motivation is explained in detail if you trouble to read the document.
Last edited by blueandwhite; 25th Mar 2016 at 22:19.
Reason: Edited to correct a typo, so that people don't concentrate on the insignificant.