The matter of what constitutes a good question (factually accurate and unambiguous) has always been a thorny one. Questions are often written by instructors who presumably feel that their questions are perfectly good. Instructors from other schools then see these questions in feedback from their students and come to a very different conclusion. Part of this problem is caused by different interpretations, but part of it is also caused by differing levels of instructor knowledge. A solution to this problem is unlikely to be achieved any time soon.
The matter of questions being based on published learning objectives should be easier to resolve. PACO, you have written some of the new OPS questions. Did you base these questions on published learning objectives?