I’m still trying to comprehend the issues contained in this 447-page thread. I'm looking for some clarity. Without resorting to the ad hominem and other logical fallacies, (e.g., red herring, non-sequitur, bandwagoning, either-or, card-stacking, and false equivalence) that certain F-35 fanboy lists are famous for, is
a single word of the report (below) not factual?
The F-35: Still Failing to Impress
How about this easier to read article?
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Is Still a Huge Mess | War Is Boring
If either of these items are not factual, without using the above said logical fallacies, how are they not factual?
In reality, haven’t I proposed an impossible task? After all, the F-35 Joint Program Office (JPO) has already confessed that,
“the DOT&E report is factually accurate.”
Just trying to find some bedrock to begin understanding this issue.