Nothing particularly startling in the report, the key issue raised is that the GA community will judge the project by what constructive measures come out of it.
Too true, I would if anything will?
Some of the spin-offs have been very useful, the pictorial AIC from DAP for the PFA rally allowed me to reconcile 'the prominent junction' that was supposed to be point 1 on the 26 grass procedure with the mini-roundabout shielded with trees that it actually was.
Perhaps the bigger question is why on earth was that chosen when there were more bigger and less confusing points?
Anyhow all credit to the CAA for setting it up and the OnTrack people for the results. Will we get a statement from the CAA on follow-up? Will there be any? Any bets?