I have re-read the report and whilst undoubtedly there is some good stuff in there, I am, quite frankly, disappointed. It seems to be a list of suggestions submitted by others, no doubt quite laudable, but with no critical evaluation as to whether they are achievable. Perhaps this wasn't their remit, I don't know.
It is easy to recognised all of the arguments put forward in the report, some of which are quite valid, and others of which are frankly unconvincing but absent any added-value commentary though, the report amounted to little more than a GA wish list.
For instance, yes, LARS can be greatly improved by having more LARS units, but how is this to be funded.
I also find it disappointing that no one from ATC was on the team.
So, where do we go from here?
VA