I am still struggling to understand what your point is. ICAO requires audits under Annex 19 and this is being conducted. Yes the catalyst was Shoreham but the investigation into that accident investigation is separate. The report is an interim update. It is a wide ranging audit in accordance with ICAO with an independent challenge panel.
I am failing to understand what your beef is. You could argue that the horse has bolted, which would be a valid criticism not not an argument for not carrying out a review or is it the money that is riling you?