Originally Posted by
Lead Balloon
I have NFI, except to say that the last thing the court would look at to determine what the applicable legal requirements were is an "information sheet".
The courts are required to follow the direction of the Act directing how Acts are to be interpreted. This says wherever there's more than one way of interpreting a regulation the intended meaning is to be applied. CASA have effectively written the regulation and provided further information on the intended meaning of the regulation and you suggest the courts wouldn't look at this information?